The city`s lawyer, Mara Elliott, informed the mayor and city council in an August 25 memo that San Diego has the option of extending existing franchise agreements beyond January 2021, subject to the mayor`s recommendation, two-thirds council approval and the SDG-E agreement. The city`s charter specifies that the extension may be granted as long as “the possibility of free and open competition and public hearings has been given.” The money san Diego receives from SDG-E on the electricity and gas franchise rights is the city`s fourth-largest source of revenue – about $60 million for last year`s general fund. The city is also raising more than $60 million for the utility underground program. San Diego Gas Co. was founded in 1881 and began in 1905 as the San Diego Consolidated Gas and Electric Co., as reported on the company`s website and the company`s website, and the company`s website, S-P Global Market Intelligence. Faulconer has set a deadline of October 23 to respond. The mayor indicated that bidders must meet certain minimum requirements, such as the willingness to pay $70 million in advances for the electricity franchise and $10 million for the gas franchise and to agree on 20-year terms for the agreements. Offers must also indicate that it is the shareholders, not the customers, who are responsible for the advances. Vasilakis was referring to the downtown skyscraper that the city bought for millions of dollars. It was formerly owned by the parent company of SDG E, Sempra Energy. A franchise agreement for SDG-E, which lasts 20 years and has no liability clauses, would be the same, he said. Faulconer`s office had to discuss the terms of the franchise pricing agreement as part of a competitive bidding process that the city has not tested in half a century.
But now that a company or company has submitted their locations to the city, he is the only one with the power to make them public and trigger a Council vote to choose a winner. In theory, each company could make an offer before 5 p.m.m. Friday, provided the company can show that it has the financial and technical means to assume responsibility for the provision of electricity and gas services to the city. “While the reasons for the President of the Board`s refusal to disclose the existing offers remain unclear, I have no doubt that the current leaders of the town hall are best equipped to tackle the complexity of securing a new franchise agreement, having been regularly informed for more than a year,” said Aimee Faucett, Acting Chief Operating Officer. , in an email. “We are close to completing this process before the existing franchise expires,” said Erik Caldwell, the city`s deputy chief operating officer. “You could always say that we could have started competing earlier for the franchise. Is it the year before (the deadline) or five years? I think we are taking the necessary steps.
The conditions proposed by the mayor stipulate that the winning company will still only have to comply with existing employment contracts for two years. Fairman said that if the new council and the mayor throw out the old offers and start again, the union would try to get a better deal. In addition to the boldness of this statement, which Mayor Kevin Faulconer, Mayor-designate Todd Gloria, City Council members and city budget analysts have all seen, they have yet to give concrete reasons why SDG-E refuses to negotiate a one-year extension. The current agreement, which covers the city limits, expires on January 17, 2021. However, some members of the community, such as Vasilakis, say that these audits will have no teeth and will try to block any agreement with a tendering service when it comes to a vote on the city council. But in a November 9 memo to Mayor Kevin Faulconer, Gémez wrote, “As a city councillor, we must commit to maximum transparency, inclusive fairness and accountability, especially when we make decisions that would deeply affect all San Diegans for years to come, as provided by the 20-year agreement currently proposed.” However, in the same memo, Elliott